A Bull elk taking a "selfie' near Clam Lake - Wisconsin DNR.

Conservation Progress

This is conservation progress:

First managed elk hunt in Wisconsin history is result of over 22 years of conservation efforts by DNR staff and partners.

Following more than 22 years of elk management and reintroduction efforts, 2018 will mark Wisconsin’s first managed elk hunt in state history.

  • For more information and background on the Wisconsin elk herd, click here.
  • To see the Wisconsin DNR news release as posted on the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation site, click here.


The Outdoors Needs Hunters

Stewardship of wilderness is in peril.  The most significant contributors to wilderness conservation are hunters, and their numbers continue to dwindle.  Hunters flip the bill for wildlife and habitat conservation management through state and federal licensing fees, federal excise taxes on firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment under the Pittman-Robertson Act (which becomes funding for state management agencies), and through donations to wildlife conservation organizations such as Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Ducks Unlimited, Mule Deer Foundation, and Pheasants Forever.

The ongoing attacks on public lands and gun control coupled with the uneducated public perception of the ethical hunter as anything other than an invaluable management tool further threatens the future of our outdoors heritageAn ongoing and growing concern for hunters is access – access to public lands, access to hunting opportunities, access which would provide mentoring to future generations of wilderness stewardsAccess which also provides opportunities to a vast array of outdoors enthusiasts as well as hunters.

The Outdoor Industry Association claims “outdoor recreation is the economy of the future,” but where are our future stewards, our future hunters, going to come from?

The statistics to consider:

A male moose takes a rest in a field during a light rainshower. By Ryan Hagerty, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Advocating for the Moose

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) recently published the results of the 2018 Aerial Moose Survey.  Results of the survey state:

After adjusting for sampling and sightability, we estimated the population in northeastern Minnesota at 3,030 [or somewhere in the range of] 2,320–4,140 [based on a] 90% confidence interval [given several] statistical uncertaint[ies] inherent in aerial wildlife surveys … Past aerial survey and research results have indicated that the long-term trend of the population in northeastern Minnesota has been declining since 2006.  The current population estimate is 65% less than the estimate in 2006 and the declining linear trend during the past decade remains statistically significant.  However, the leveling since 2012 persists, and … the trend from 2012 to 2018 is not declining.  While this recent short-term trend (7-year) is noteworthy, it applies only to the existing survey estimates, and does not forecast the future trajectory of the population.

While it appears the population has stabilized in the short-term, the long-term decline of the moose in Minnesota continues to make this a race against time.

Minnesota’s moose population has been drastically declining over the past three decades.  While population estimates remained relatively stable in the northeastern range during the mid-1980s to mid-2000s, the population in the northwestern range virtually disappeared.  Now it is the remaining population in the northeastern range that is under assault.  The MN DNR implemented a massive research project under the Minnesota Moose Research and Management Plan in December 2011 in hopes of learning what is causing the decline and how to better manage the moose and its habitat in relationship to environmental and social concerns. The moose was finally listed as an animal of special concern in Minnesota since another dramatic drop in the population from 2012 to 2013.  This also caused the MN DNR to discontinue offering a moose hunting season in association with managing the herd until population estimates have recovered – even though the hunt was shown to only contribute a 2% reduction in the population as a restricted once-in-a-lifetime style hunt starting in 1991 and further restricted to a bulls-only hunt in 2007.  What researchers are discovering through the project involves a complex mix of environmental influences and social pressures.

MN DNR research results show contributors to the moose decline include, but may not be limited to, the environmental influences of: wolf and white-tail deer populations, parasites (such as winter ticks and brainworm), less frequent forest fires and logging on public lands, and climate change.  Factors best laid out by this February 7, 2016, Minneapolis Star Tribune article by Josephine Marcotty.  However, implementing management practices that would promote a healthier moose herd are also subject to, but not limited to, the social pressures from local landowners, wildlife enthusiasts, hunters, private business, and local economies and cultures.  Further elaboration on these factors can found in a February 16, 2018, Minnesota Public Radio News article by Dan Kraker.  Indeed, this struggle goes much deeper than simply saving the moose.  This permeates all facets of Northern Minnesota culture.

We recently received a survey from Colorado State University on behalf of the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies requesting feedback “about public perceptions of issues concerning the management of fish and wildlife in your state.”  While the correspondence states it is “part of a national survey effort,” several questions in the survey itself are directed at specific concerns within Minnesota.  And, while it is obvious that surveys were customized to address specific issues within each state, one specific set of questions made me take special notice of this particular survey:

The interactions between wolves, moose, and deer are complex.  Moose are known to die from diseases that white-tail deer carry, and wolves prey on both species.  Please let us know how you feel about management of these three species in Minnesota….

Who is advocating for the moose in Minnesota?  Where does support for the Minnesota moose come from?  How is our society and culture promoting the practice of stewardship of wilderness for the preservation and conservation of the moose for the generations to come?  While there are organizations dedicated to most of the other large mammals in Minnesota, such as the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association, the International Wolf Center, the American Bear Association, the North American Bear Center, and the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.  There appears to be no organization, foundation, association, federation, unlimited, or forever dedicated to the moose.  My search did lead me to the North American Moose Foundation, but that organization seems to have ceased operation sometime after their last scheduled annual banquet was cancelled, ironically intended to take place in Roseville, Minnesota, in February 2014.  The University of Minnesota, the Minnesota Zoo, and The Nature Conservancy, along with other conservation organizations, conduct or support research and conservation for the moose, but there appears to be no dedicated organization to support one of the largest mammals in North America.  In fact, a University of Minnesota researcher has resorted to crowd funding in order to raise money for her research!

To continue your own research into the story of the moose in Minnesota, follow these additional links:

Moose, Superior National Forest, Minnesota, USA, by USDA Forest Service
Moose, Superior National Forest, Minnesota, USA, by USDA Forest Service
Bald eagle nesting pair near the Necktie River, Hubbard County, MN.

The Minnesota DNR Nongame Wildlife Eagle Cam

Keep a live eye on the eagle’s nest!  There’s no sound, but just hit play and enjoy the live view of these beautiful raptors!  Or you can find it here:  The Minnesota DNR Nongame Wildlife Eagle Cam

According to a Minneapolis Star Tribune article by John Reinam published June 10 2017:

“Our bald eagle population is doing very well. We have the highest population of bald eagles in the Lower 48,” said Lori Naumann, a representative of the nongame wildlife program of the state Department of Natural Resources (DNR).  Naumann said Minnesota has about 9,800 pairs of bald eagles, with the birds having made a remarkable comeback from 30 or so years ago, when they were considered endangered.

Bald eagle nesting pair near the Necktie River, Hubbard County, MN.
Bald eagle nesting pair near the Necktie River, Hubbard County, MN.



Global Temp ChangeDo you think that climate change is something to be concerned about?

Yes.  Even though scientists may disagree about the causes and extent of global climate change, it is difficult to deny that the planet’s climate is warming.  The trend in temperature rise is causing weather extremes and environmental changes locally, such as four feet of snow in Northern Minnesota in April and flooding beyond any prior recorded levels in Iowa, as well as around the globe, such as the ice mass loss on the Antarctic Peninsula, worldwide glacier retreat, rising ocean levels, and melting Arctic sea ice.

The fact that our global environment is changing should be a cause for concern worldwide for every individual who cares about what kind of world we leave behind for our children.

Are you going to change anything about your lifestyle?

  • I have reduced my use of fossil fuels by
    • Commuting by bicycle when possible
    • Decreasing lawnmower use by 70%
    • Maximizing gas mileage while maintaining safe driving practices
    • Turning the thermostat down in the winter and up in the summer
    • Minimizing electricity use in my home
  • I am refusing
    • To purchase environmentally costly plastic containered products, such as bottled water
    • The use of petroleum produced plastic grocery bags – green bags instead
    • The purchase of more “stuff” – time to downsize the toy category
    • Junk mail by using organizations that limit the ridiculous influx of unnecessary propaganda
    • To purchase domestic meat products – wild game instead
    • The use of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides
  • I am reducing
    • The amount of paper products I use
    • The amount of unnecessary refuse in my waste water – even though I have a septic system
  • I am reusing
    • Water bottles
    • Paper products
    • Clothing
    • Ammunition
  • I am recycling even more conscientiously than previous to this course
  • I am planning
    • A greener property with native plant restoration
    • Research into renewable personal energy sources
    • To purchase more locally grown and organically grown produce
    • To purchase more environmentally friendly toiletries and cleaning products
    • To purchase more previously owned products – if purchase is necessary
    • Building a greener, more environmentally friendly home

The list can and will be longer, but this is a good start!