Campus Environmental Tour

Talloires DeclarationOn Tuesday we took a little stroll around campus discussing some of the ways Bemidji State University demonstrates its responsibility as an institution for higher education by creating an educational environment that pledges to work towards sustainability.  As a public educational institution producing tomorrow’s leaders, the university needs to set an example for the generations of the current and future environmental stewards it prepares for graduation into society.  If our society is to change its practice of mismanagement of our natural capital, we have to learn how to change.  By establishing educational resources for the study of how we can successfully become a sustainable society, Bemidji State University joins a commitment to environmentalism with other leading institutions and organizations working to provide a healthier future for our local and global ecosystem.  The president of the university, Dr. Jon Quistgaard, promises this obligation by uniting with over 350 university presidents and chancellors in over 40 countries around the world in the Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future through the Talloires Declaration, and the university community expects a proposal to further this promise with a future signing of the American College & University Presidents Climate Commitment.

Other examples of Bemidji State University’s commitment to an ecocentric environmental worldview are detailed in these press releases from the university on November 29, 2007:

Other campus projects I find to be equally important, if not on the same scale as the above mentioned movements of environmentalism, then on the measure of what can be done by the individual or small group to renew and improve our campus and community are:BSU Campus Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project on Lake Bemidji

  • The Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project performs the following benefits for our local ecosystem and our downstream neighbors:
    • Restores a buffer zone using native plants
    • Provide habitat for a wide variety of wildlife
    • Filter out pollutants and runoff that degrade water quality
    • Prevent shoreline erosion by absorbing wave action
  • The implementation of a Rain Garden to reduce runoff and naturally filter storm water.

What is a Rain GardenA BSU Rain Garden

  • Landscaping with Native Plants such as a Butterfly Garden provide multiple benefits:
    • Native plants have evolved and adapted to local conditions over thousands of years.  Once established, they require no irrigation or fertilization.  They are resistant to most pests and diseases, and require no mowing.  Thus, native plants, conserving water and fossil fuels, and requiring less work to maintain, are less costly in the long term.
    • Native plants have longer root systems than non-native species which helps rainfall percolate into the soil, reducing erosion and runoff, and recharging ground water and improving water quality.
    • Native plants provide food and shelter for birds, butterflies and other desirable wildlife.

BSU Butterfly GardenThis little tour around campus inspired me to begin planning some improvements to my own property’s landscape.  I have always favored native plants for their simplistic beauty and minimal maintenance.  I especially have affinity for trees.  After discussing the question of why we mow and manicure our lawn with Professor Bailey-Johnson when a thoughtfully landscaped native plant ecosystem provides habitat for beneficial species, such as dragonflies – which prefer longer grasses while mosquitoes do not and dragonflies eat mosquitoes, I would rather have more habitat and wildlife on my property than an aesthetically pleasing keeping-up-with-the-Jones’-look.  Also, there is the consideration of time spent mowing – three hours per tour for me, but I have plans to cut that in half – and the incredible fact that 5% of all emissions in this country come from lawnmowers.  I mean really – why?

Thoughts on “How Much is Clean Water Worth?”

“How Much is Clean Water Worth?” is a fascinating feature article written by Jim Morrison for the Feb./Mar. 2005 issue of National Wildlife, the magazine of the National Wildlife Federation.  There are some staggering, almost unfathomable, numbers in the form of dollar amounts calculated when it comes to the value of our global ecosystem – something that really should need no dollar value as it is invaluable to all of us using this planet.

However, how does a controversial 1997 Nature report estimating the annual dollar value of the global ecosystem to be $33 trillion grab you?  That’s ($33,000,000,000,000.00) 14 zeroes in dollars and cents if you’re counting – and I was.  Apparently it grabbed some the wrong way:

One report by researchers at the University of Maryland, Bowden College and Duke University called the estimate “absurd,” noting that if taken literally, the figure suggests that a family earning $30,000 annually would pay $40,000 annually for ecosystem protection.

But, if not taken literally, how can we begin to make exponentially important decisions about the future of our society as a species, and the managing species, on this planet.  If we continue to ignore stewardship of our natural resources as a society by not assigning an economic value to something that is invaluable, when will the price tag to correct our mismanagement exceed our natural capital?  Or have we already reached a point where we are writing checks our collective butts can’t cash?

The article is packed full of amazing examples of stewardship and recognition of our natural capital in the form of monetary valuation that gives me some new hope in our society.  Examples of restoring what nature had intended all along; restoring for not only natural instrumental benefits, but the intrinsic social, economical, and ecological benefits as well.

If the planet is still offering us the chance to fix our mistakes in stewardship, and if the best way to recognize the benefits of fixing those mistakes is by assigning a dollar figure to enhance the understandability of the big picture, then, I say, give me a price gun and I’ll help price tag the place.

What did it cost you to read this rant?  Time.  What did it cost the earth in natural capital to provide you the opportunity to read this rant?  Time.  If, as the old saying goes, time is money – which is more valuable to me?  And do you really want to know my answer?

Thoughts on “How Nature Nurtures”

The online article “How Nature Nurtures”is a book review by Connie Matthiessen of the book Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children From Nature-Deficit Disorder by Richard Louv.  Matthiessen explains:

Louv presents a compelling argument that children, and the rest of us for that matter, require regular contact with nature to maintain physical and emotional health.

Louv coined the term “nature-deficit disorder” to describe the consequences of separating children from the natural world.

Personally, this is the first I have heard of this term, but it is something I can relate to by observing the youth of family and friends and the students in my hunter education classes.  The goal of the very first assignment I give to the students in my classes, an essay entitled “Why I’m Taking Firearm Safety,” is to get them thinking about the outdoors and the reasons why they desire this experience, whether it be for the excitement of the hunt, family involvement, building relationships with family and friends through the outdoors, just the pure joy that is exploring nature, or all of the above.

Matthiessen goes on to state:

Many parents of hyperactive children notice the calming effect nature has on their sons and daughters. Recent research supports these observations. Louv cites several studies showing that contact with nature can improve a child’s concentration. One study found that even a view of greenery through a window reduced attention-deficit symptoms.

One can see the young mind at work with the fuel of imagination in the series of essays I have started on my hunter education website with the contributions of some of the young, and older, authors.  Many of the students write some truly compelling responses in this task, and the reason I have chosen to share their work is to demonstrate that our outdoors heritage still runs strong in our youth of today.  Offering the opportunity for our children to gain the experiences the outdoors can provide, as it did for our generation and every generation before us, is now a serious issue for some.

Matthiessen shows that Louv points out that it doesn’t take much effort:

Establishing a relationship with nature requires nothing more than access to a vacant lot or a small patch of woods. You can nourish your child’s spirit by giving him opportunities to garden, care for animals, explore tidepools, or build a fort in the woods.

This is what I have tried to provide for the young lives I have had the good fortune to touch in my life.  When I was younger, it was all about camping, fishing, or working together outdoors with my parents and siblings.  Then as I got older, it was about sports when it came to family gatherings, and in fact the sports event themselves became family gatherings.  Recently, it has been mentoring my siblings and nephews in our outdoors heritage of hunting and fishing.

Matthiessen’s summation of Louv’s work is valuable advice for us all:

Last Child in the Woods amounts to a warning to society to take action before it’s too late. Nature-deficit disorder threatens the well-being of our entire planet. If our children and grandchildren become alienated from nature, they are unlikely to protect it. Louv points out that environmentalism is a value that springs from an early and profound childhood experience in nature. Children raised on video games, trips to the shopping mall, and vacations in Disneyland are unlikely to become defenders of the natural world. When nature itself suffers a deficit, we’ll all be in trouble.

One final point, I would just like to reiterate that it is not only about the youth of today, but about us all.  I can attest to the fact that, when I don’t personally get a chance to get outdoors during any extended period of time, it definitely has an affect on my emotional state and therefore affects production in other facets of my life.  While the technological world we live in today is changing the way our youth experience life, there is a warning for the older generations as well to remember to take time to renew your outdoors heritage and share those experiences with our youth.

Check out some of the ways organizations are working to change the Nature-Deficit Disorder: